Now there’s word that The New York Times may sue OpenAI.
(ChatGPT wouldn’t be the only one using that information to answer users' questions, or prompts.
Over the past few months, OpenAI has seemed to acknowledge the copyright issues.
Google “has not said how such a system should work,” The Guardian noted.
While opting out is something, it doesn’t really address the copyright issues.
Where will this all go?
Here are the other doings in AI worth your attention.
“Want to quickly determine what other customers are saying about a product before reading through the reviews?”
wrote Vaughn Schermerhorn, director of community shopping at Amazon.
Of course, there’s a question about whether those reviews are legit, asCNET,Wiredandothershavereported.
“This is very weird and honestly unsettling,” said another.
And my favorite: “Even a robot ain’t got time for me.”
Snapchat told CNN it was a “glitch” and not a sign of sentience.
Sure, it was a glitch.
It also may be less clear that you’re talking to a computer."
The goal, the company adds, is to help its employees find stuff.
Even for senior colleagues, the work typically takes two weeks of researching and networking."
What kind of things might it advise you on?
It might also create a financial budget for you, including meal and workout plans, the Times said.
Turns out there’s now an app for that.
Yeah, what could possibly go wrong with that?
But ChatGPT opened the opportunity to allow for interaction with users.
I downloaded the app so I could ask “Jesus Christ” for comment.
As a journalist, I’ll just say, Amen to that.
Ascribing humanlike qualities to nonhuman things, like computers or animals, isn’t a new idea.
“Anthropomorphism: The tendency for people to attribute humanlike qualities or characteristics to an AI chatbot.
