If you create it from scratch with an AI, do you own it?
A federal judge this month said no.
“Human authorship is a bedrock requirement,“Judge Howell wrote in her Aug. 18 ruling.
“Copyright protection does not extend to the creations of non-human entities.”
The 15-page ruling is worth a read.
Here’s a bit of the recap from the Reporter, with the relevant callouts from Howell’s opinion.
Still, the copyright office in March said thatsome AI-assisted materials might qualify for protectionin particular instances.
Here are the other doings in AI worth your attention.
Users with AI-generated photos told the news organizations that no one has noticed an AI was involved.
Others offer paying clients the opportunity to ‘nudify’ women they know, such as classmates or colleagues.”
Don’t hold your breath.
AI as the ‘boss from hell’?
“It’s very easy to be dazzled.
Is it alive or not?
Turing also called his test the imitation game.
But I’ll share their assessment of ChatGPT, as summarized by Nature.
“This key in of system arguably has some of the indicators of consciousness associated with global workspace theory.
When facilitating the test, a human evaluator judges conversations between a human and machine.
If the evaluator cannot distinguish between responses, then the machine passes the Turing test.”
Here’s my prompt and its answer.
It’s the last graph that tells you what you should probably know.
Prompt: Has ChatGPT passed the Turing Test?
It is worth mentioning that GPT-3 has its limitations, such as occasionally producing incorrect or nonsensical answers.
